Effects of Electromagnetic Fields (EMFs) Played Down By Industry
Can electromagnetic fields (EMFs) from power lines, home wiring, airport and military radar, substations, transformers, computers and appliances cause brain tumors, leukemia, birth defects, miscarriages, chronic fatigue, headaches, cataracts, heart problems, stress. nausea, chest pain, forgetfulness, cancer and other health problems?
Dr. David Carpenter, Dean at the School of Public Health, State University of New York believes it is likely that up to 30% of all childhood cancers come from exposure to EMFs. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) warns “There is reason for concern” and advises prudent avoidance”.
Martin Halper, the EPA’s Director of Analysis and Support says “I have never seen a set of epidemiological studies that remotely approached the weight of evidence that we’re seeing with EMFs. Clearly there is something here.”
Concerns over EMFs Exploded
Concern over EMFs exploded after Paul Brodeur wrote a series of articles in the New Yorker Magazine in June 1989. Because of Paul Brodeur’s reputation. his articles had a catalytic effect on scientists, reporters and concerned people throughout the world.
In November 1989, the Department of Energy reported that “It has now become generally accepted that there are, indeed, biological effects due to field exposure.”
The EMF issue gained more publicity in 1990 when alarming reports appeared in Time, the Wall Street Journal, Business Week and popular computer publications. ABC’s Ted Koppel and CBS’s Dan Rather both aired special segments on EMFs.
In addition to the long-term health concerns, buying a house with high fields will be an economic disaster. In a few years, when power line radiation is as well known as asbestos and radon, a house with high fields will be practically impossible to sell. Already there are hundreds of lawsuits regarding EMFs and property devaluation.
EPA Says the EMF Threat Is Real
By 1990, over one hundred studies had been conducted worldwide. Of these, at least two dozen epidemiological studies on humans indicated a link between EMFs and serious health problems. In response to public pressure, the Environmental Protection Agency IEPA) began reviewing and evaluating the available literature.
In a draft report issued in March 1990, the EPA recommended that EMFs be classified as a Class B carcinogen — -a “probable human carcinogen and joined the ranks of formaldehyde, DDT, dioxins and PCBs.
After the EPA draft report was released, utility, military and computer lobbyists came down hard on the EPA. The EPA’s final revision did NOT classify EMFs as a Class B carcinogen Rather, the following explanation was added:”
At this time such a characterization regarding the link between cancer and exposure to EMFs is not appropriate because the basic nature of the interaction between EMFs and biological processes leading to cancer is not understood.”
Curiously, this rather unusual logic appears on the same page as the following: “In conclusion, several studies showing leukemia, Iymphoma and cancer of the nervous system in children exposed to supported by similar findings in adults in several/ occupational studies also involving electrical power frequency exposures, show a consistent pattern of response that suggest a causal link. ”
When questioned about the contradictory nature of these statements, the EPA responded that it was “not appropriate” to use the probable carcinogen label until it could demonstrate how EMFs caused cancer and exactly how much EMF is harmful.
This explanation does not satisfy many critics who claim that the EPAs upper management was influenced by political and economic considerations exerted by utility, computer and military lobbyists.
Why Take the EMFs Risk?
At Floww International, we sare convinced that EMF radiation is harmful.
This discussion between Research and Lobbyists will continue for a while, but there is no need to take a risk:
Today, radiation protection products are available at such reasonable costs, that it is a “no brainer” to protect yourself against the “possible” hazardhous effects of EMF radiation. Take a look at other articles on this site or check out the radiation protection products.
Tagged with: airport emf • airport radar radiation • Alarming Reports • brain cancer dr.mercola • Brain Tumors • chest pain dr mercola • Childhood Cancers • chinese emf study power line • Chronic Fatigue • Computer Publications • David Carpenter • david carpenter emf • david carpenter study emf • dr david carpenter • Dr Mercola • dr mercola childhood cancer • dr mercola emf protection • dr mercola emf protection video • dr mercola emfs • dr mercola radiation protection • dr. david carpenter emf • dr. marcola and powerlines • electromagnetic dan rather • emf airport radar • emf chest pains • emf exposure • emf fatigue • Emf Issue • emf new yorker magazine • emf protection mercola • emf radiation from radar • Environmental Protection Agency • environmental protection agency emf • EPA's prudent avoidance • Epidemiological Studies • Field Exposure • floww emf • Long Term Health • mercola chest pain • mercola computer • mercola computer radiation • mercola emf power lines • mercola emf protection] • mercolaemf protection • Military Radar • New Yorker Magazine • Paul Brodeur • Power Line Radiation • Prudent Avoidance • prudent avoidance emf • radar emf • radiation from airport radar • radiation from military radar • radiation protection materials from radar • School Of Public Health • Ted Koppel • ted mercola • Term Health Concerns • the floww + emf • transformer and brain tumour • transformers and brain tumors • Wall Street Journal
Filed under: Radiation and Health
Like this post? Subscribe to my RSS feed and get loads more!