The Effect of Radiation: Riduculed, Opposed and finally Accepted
Radiation is Harmful to Humans, Animals and Nature
By: drs. Marc Schechtl, CEO of Floww International
The position of Floww International is clear: radiation has a negative impact on humans, animals and nature, so all living organisms are affected. Radiation disrupts cell communication. Humans, animals, plants, trees, they all consist of cells.
Currently we are exposed to radiation 24 hours a day. Our immune system must be working overtime to keep the harmful radiation out. Therefore we (humans, animals and nature) are more susceptible to diseases.
Radiation is a Health Risk: An Inconvenient Truth
When I first studied scientific publications of radiation and health in 2003, I was amazed about the amount of scientific studies which had been published already. I asked myself, why is this not known to doctors, therapists and the general public, or are we all ignoring it because it’s inconvenient?
To be quite honest: when I realised that my complaints at work were related to radiation (this was in 1998), my first thought was “what a load of nonsense!”.
I was suffering from fatigue and headaches and had concentration problems and my complaints persisted. Later on, I realised I had to blame the sources of radiation (my telephone and computer at work). My symptoms were causing me stress, nausea and pain and became more frequent over time.
At a certain moment, I really couldn’t function properly anymore. Then I admitted to myself: I must be sensitive to the radiation around me. That was the first step to a solution, although fighting the problem was (and is) not the solution.
It took me five years until I was ready to admit that radiation influenced my health: it was a very inconvenient truth indeed…
Today, I recognise my own reaction in a quote of Schoppenhauer, a German philosopher:
“All truth passes through three stages: first, it is ridiculed, secondly it is vigorously opposed, and thirdly, it is accepted as self-evident”.
Acceptance of radiation as a health risk
Prof. Dr. Adflkofer was the leading scientist of a large European study who found that mobile phone radiation causes DNA damage. This study (REFLEX) was published in 2003. The first years it was ignored, then came the conflict (opposition), while researchers were accused of fraud by the Telecom Industry. Today, years later, the opposition is dismissed and acceptance is arising: radiation can be harmful. And if you acknowledge the problem the first step to a solution has been made.
Watch an interview with Professor Adlkofer which describes the process of denial, then the conflict and the beginning of acceptance of the effect of radiation on health:
Now the World Health Organisation (WHO), the European Council and world leading scientists acknowledge the possible harm of radiation. It is clear that we are slowly moving to acceptance of the Truth that radiation influences health. It will take a couple of years until it is self-evident. Then solutions will follow. Floww Health Technology will be integrated in our communication technologies, like smart phones, e-readers etc. A radiation-friendly world, a blue planet.
Take a look at Floww solutions which convert radiation to a body friendly wavelength.
Tagged with: adiation fromreaders • bad aspects of nature • bad effects of nature • bad effects on nature • cell phone radiation • cell phone vs. ereader radiation • dangers of e-readers health hazards • dangers of using e-readers • does e readers have radiation • e reader health issues • e reader with lowest radiation • e readers and health • e readers radiation • e-reader radiation • e-readers effect on health • e-readers harmful health • effect of radiation • effects of e-readers • effects of radiation in nature • effects of radiation on nature • electronic readers and health hazards • ereader health risks • ereaders affect to your health • ereaders health affect • ereaders radiation • ereaders vs cell phones radiation • harmful effects of e readers • harmful nature of radiation • hazards e readers • hazards of e readers • health effects of e readers • health harms of e readers • health hazard of E Reader • health hazards of electronic readers • health issues of e-readers • health issues with e-readers • health problems related to e-readers • health risks e readers • health risks from using e-readers • health risks of e readers • marc schechtl • Mark + Floww • mark schechtl • nature bad impact • negative effects ereaders • negative effects of nature • negative medical effects of e-readers • opposed accepted as self evident • radiation around me • radiation bad effects of nature • radiation disrupts cell communication • radiation e reader • radiation e readers • radiation effect on nature • radiation effects on nature • radiation exposure • radiation from e readers • radiation from e-reader • radiation from ereaders • radiation harmful • radiation harmful nature • radiation health risk • radiation levels in e readers • radiation of e-readers • radiation sickness • risks of e-readers • WHO radiation research • World Health Organization irradiation opposed
Filed under: Radiation and Health
Like this post? Subscribe to my RSS feed and get loads more!